Reviewing Human Rights in Malaysia
Yu Ren Chung, Advocacy Officer, Women's Aid Organization (WAO) | Suri Kempe, Programme Manager, Sisters In Islam (SIS)
24-Oct-13 15:00
Embed Podcast
You can share this podcast by copying this HTML to your clipboard and pasting into your blog or web page.
Close
All member states of the United Nations are subjected to a Universal Periodic Review (UPR) every four and a half years by the Human Rights Council to gauge the extent to which the state under review is fulfilling its obligations to promote, protect and fulfil the rights of people who live in that country. Malaysia was first reviewed in 2009, and was reviewed again on 24th October for the second time.
As part of the review process, the UN would take into account the report submitted by the Malaysian government, various reports compiled by UN agencies, as well as a third report summarizing various stakeholders’ positions. One of those stakeholders is the coalition of Malaysian NGOs, or COMANGO, who is advocating for a more progressive agenda with an emphasis on equality. Another stakeholder is the coalition of Muslim NGOs, or MuslimUPro, who champions a more conservative agenda, which stress upon Malaysia’s unique circumstance as a multi-ethnic and multi-faith country.
Here to articulate COMANGO’s stance is Yu Ren Chung, advocacy officer of Women’s Aid Organization (WAO), and Suri Kempe, programme manager of Sisters in Islam (SIS).
This and more than 60,000 other podcasts in your hand. Download the all new BFM mobile app.
Categories:
Tags: upr, university periodic review, un, united nations, human rights council, human rights, women's aid organization, wao, sisters in islam, sis, muslimupro, ngo